Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Why Romney and NOT Newt...

Ok, I have discussed the main issues which are important to most conservatives. Now let’s look at each candidate’s position on these issues. I will make this very simple - because it is very simple. There is almost no difference between the candidates on all the important issues - with the exception of Ron Paul.

Supreme Court Justices

All the Republican candidates claim they will appoint judges who interpret the U.S. Constitution. They say they will appoint judges in the mold of Antonin Scalia and John Roberts. In case you don’t realize it - this is great. Scalia and Roberts are great justices who understand their role as Supreme Court justices.

Let me remind all my conservative friends - our current President believes the U.S. Constitution is a “living and breathing” document which changes with the times. He nominates liberals to the Supreme Court who use their vote in an attempt to change our country into a liberal utopia; a country based on liberal ideology which goes against the will and common sense of the people.

The Environment

All the Republican candidates claim they will take a balanced approach to the environment. They will use the county’s resources to meet the needs of our country while protecting the environment. This means drilling for oil where it’s appropriate and allowing for the construction of nuclear power plants where it’s appropriate. Also, they all claim they are against Cap and Trade, the Kyoto Protocol, and all the other left wing, radical, environmental movement programs.

Let me remind all my conservative friends - our current President places the wants and desires of the Environmentalists above the needs of our country.
Case in point, he is threatening to veto legislation which will allow for the construction of a pipe line which will bring oil from Canada to the U.S. The construction of this pipeline will provide us with more oil/gas and it will create REAL jobs. There is no reason why any reasonable man would veto this legislation. So why is he threatening to veto it? He is threatening to veto it because of the Environmental lobby - period.

Military

With the exception of Ron Paul, all the Republicans believe we live in a dangerous world which requires a strong U.S. military. Of course there are some candidates who would use the military more aggressively and others who would use it less aggressively.

War on Terror

With the exception of Ron Paul, all the Republicans believe the War on Terror is being waged against radical Islam and because of this, they will aggressively pursue radical Islamist terrorists. Of course there are some candidates who would go after the Terrorists more aggressively and some who would be less aggressive but they (except for Ron Paul) would continue the policy of killing Terrorists.

The Economy

All the Republicans believe we need lower taxes, less regulation, and a balanced budget. Of course there are some candidates who would more aggressively lower taxes, reduce regulation, and balance the budget - and there are some who would be less aggressive.

Let me remind my conservative friends that the Obama Administration has taken a bad economy and made it worse. He has taken the BAD decisions made by the Bush Administration and said, “I’ll take your 5 bad decisions and I’ll raise you 50 bad decisions!” Obama is the second coming of FDR. FDR took a bad economy and he implemented liberal economic policies which created the Great Depression. Obama took a bad economy and he implemented liberal economic policies which has created the Great Recession.

As a side note, Ronald Reagan took a bad economy and implemented conservative economic policies which created the biggest non-war time boom in the history of man.

So, to summarize, there’s not much difference between the Republican nominees (except for Ron Paul).

I can hear some of my conservative friends saying, “Ken, you’re down playing the difference between...” or “There’s a big difference between...” or “If he’s elected he will...” or “If he’s elected he won’t...” To that I say, “Yeah, yeah, yeah.”

In my humble opinion, there is not a perfect Republican running. There is not a Ronald Reagan in the current group of Republican candidates - there are GOOD conservatives, very GOOD conservatives - each with their own flaws - like we all have.

But let’s not forget, we have a president who is trying to fundamentally change our country. He has taken all the bad decisions that all the previous presidents have made and he’s stepped on their shoulders and said, “I can top your bad decisions - watch this...” The unemployment rate was bad when he took over - it’s now worse. The deficit was bad when he took over - it’s now worse. The debt was bad when he took over - it’s now worse. Crony Capitalism was bad when he took over - it’s now worse. These - and many, many, many other aspects of our country - are worse now because of his policies (yes, his policies) and if we want our children to live in the greatest country in the world we must defeat Obama!

That must be the objective! That must be the goal! That is what MUST drive our decision when selecting the Republican nominee - WHO CAN BEAT OBAMA?!

I can guarantee you that I’m more conservative than most people, I’m certainly not an elitist, I’m not part of the mainstream media, I’m not part of any good ole boy network, and I’m not a sell out! But - I am for Mitt Romney! Why? Because he will win and Newt will lose!

How can I say this? Because, my fellow conservative, we make up 35% of the electorate, while liberals make up 30% of the electorate. The other 35% don’t watch Fox News, they don’t listen to Rush, they don’t read conservative blogs - they don’t know (and don’t care) about many of the issues we care about. They make their decisions based on the cover of People Magazine at the grocery store check out. They make their decisions based on how people look and sound. We need a conservative candidate who can appeal to conservatives but also to this a-political 35%.

Let me make this clear - Newt Gingrich will lose against Barak Obama. Newt will make you feel great while he’s debating Obama because he will put Obama in his liberal place. He will show Obama for what he is - a condescending liberal! But guess what? As you’re sitting on the couch reveling in the #@$ whooping Gingrich laid on Obama - you will see the polls that ask, “Is Newt Gingrich really the devil?” or “Do you think Newt Gingrich will use the Atomic Bomb?” or “Will Newt Gingrich eat your children?” Who remembers "The Gingrich Who Stole Christmas"?

These questions will be put on People Magazine and Ms Magazine and all of a sudden the a-political 35% will say, “He just looks so mean.” Then Newt will lose the election 51% to 49% and you’ll wonder why these 35% are so stupid.

More to come...

7 comments:

Rich said...

Great post but Newt blew it yesterday and you missed the most important point about Newt in my opinion. Newt went after Romney saying "is Mitt going to apoligize for bankrupting companies and laying off workers" in his response to Mitt saying Newt should give back the taxpayer's money from Freddie and Fannie.

Newt showed his instincts. I no longer can trust Newt to stand up to the chorus of anti capitalist media that will crucify the private sector for doing what private business has to do. Private business must be allowed to fail without government intervention. Newt just blew it! I am livid and will be supporting Romney because as you state we must defeat the worst president in recent history. Pure evil against our constitutional principles of governance! At least Mitt knows how to turn around failing businesses without government help!

Lynn said...

well said. I agree with you, Kenny. Although I do like Newt better and do think he would eat obama (get it?) You better watch out ....you might be the next Carl Rove;)

Anonymous said...

Kenny they are going to demonize ANY nominee we put in front of them. It doesn't matter who. I will not vote for Mitt Romney in a primary - if he wins the nomination of course I'll vote for him and hope for the best but the democrats are going to tear Romney apart the same as Newt.

Chris

Anonymous said...

Maybe I’m way off base here but I thought it was more of a tit-for-tat type of response that Newt made - I don’t believe Newt thinks either one of them should return money that was earned as a private citizen. IMHO Newt was making a point when responding. At the time Newt was a private citizen who was working as a consultant and was paid for that service. In that same respect, Romney was a private business man earning his money.

Anonymous said...

I will vote for ANY republican running against Obama in the presidential election but I will not vote for Romney in the primary’s. Newt, Santaurum, or Bachman will get my vote before Romney will.

Here’s my thinking: If Romney wins the primary then the democrats will have nothing to fear and will be comfortable with Obama in the debates. BUT if Newt wins they’ll have much to fear because Newt would wipe the floor clean with Obama and the democrats know this. They’ll be a push to get him, Obama, out and have some one like Hillary go up against Newt - just my thought : )

Tricia
P.S.
I'm not sure what Lynn meant by her comment comparing you to Karl Rove but I'm sure it wasn't a compliment.

LOVE THE DISCUSSION !!

Anonymous said...

Tricia, I like santorum too ...he would be my second choice. I do agree that Newt gave a tit-for-tat response but his tat was an inexcusable tat. And it showed a lack of judgement or at the very lease a lack of discipline. What other liberal talking points will he use to criticize republicans in the future? Romney criticized Newt for doing things conservatives hate - he used his insider status to become rich. Newts response was to criticize free enterprise. That was outrageous...with conservatives like this...who needs liberals. Newt would be the second worst choice we could make. The only other republican who would lose as bad as Newt is Ron Paul. Kenny

Anonymous said...

I have a few more points...Romney is a conservative - yes he's conservative!! He is more conservative than George Bush...hes as conservative as Ronaldus Magnus...he is not a moderate! And he is clearly more conservative and stable than Newt. Also, Romney is not an insider Newt is! Kenny